Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nastasja Mariana Schunk vs Berfu Cengiz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schunk vs Cengiz analysis and find out who is favored!
Nastasja Mariana Schunk vs Berfu Cengiz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Schunk 0 - 0 Cengiz
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schunk has won 50.22% of points on his second serve, while Cengiz has won 46.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schunk, in recent form, has won 56.39% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cengiz has won 61.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.36% and 37.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schunk has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cengiz has saved 54.66% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schunk has won 65.85% of matches played (W/L 27/ 14), with Cengiz winning 47.37% (W/L 27/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schunk has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 64/ 34), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9). Cengiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 96/ 55), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 69/ 61).
- Player level: In the last year, Schunk has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.33% of matches (W/L 19/ 11), where as Cengiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 24/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schunk has played against opponents with an average rank of 256.2 while Cengiz has played against players with an average rank of 324.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schunk has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cengiz has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schunk has converted 45.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cengiz has converted 50.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Schunk 0 - 0 Cengiz
538
Rank
143
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
356
Rank
228
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
60% (99-65)
Career Total W/L
58% (228-166)
61% (19-12)
YTD W/L
63% (17-10)
$105,902
Career Prize Money
$2,824
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nastasja Mariana Schunk | Berfu Cengiz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (19/12) | 63% (17/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (44/31) | 60% (39/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (357/295) | 53% (329/286) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 74% (14/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (13/6) | 33% (2/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 83 | 24 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 80 | 74 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:50 | 1:37:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 308.39 | 322.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1374/2047) | 67% (1282/1917) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (880/1374) | 60% (774/1282) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (338/673) | 47% (301/635) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (119/261) | 51% (125/245) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (953/2164) | 47% (950/2035) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 100% (2/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (19/11) | 58% (14/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (19/31) | 63% (17/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 56% (5/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 54% (7/13) | 55% (6/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (19/15) | 75% (16/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (19/4) | 25% (16/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (12/4) | 45% (11/5) |
Nastasja Mariana Schunk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Nellie Taraba Wallberg
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
52%
(
57 of
110)
1st Serve %
74%
(
58 of
78)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
47%
(
52 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
0-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Martha Matoula
71%
(
73 of
103)
1st Serve %
58%
(
74 of
128)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
62 of
128)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Tamara Zidansek
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
2
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Federica Di Sarra
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Arianna Zucchini
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Anne Schaefer
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Berfu Cengiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Francesca Curmi
83%
(
50 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Fanny Stollar
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
66%
(
75 of
114)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
51 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
108
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Gergana Topalova
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Nellie Taraba Wallberg
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Sandra Samir
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Priscilla Hon
Player
Berfu Cengiz
69%
(
68 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
47%
(
47 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
101
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Berfu Cengiz
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
94
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Kayla Day
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
0
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Schunk Vs Cengiz Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Berfu Cengiz
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
